Discussion about this post

User's avatar
David Berigny's avatar

I’m kind of the opposite, all I did was art and music, then art school, then art theory, then art hypocrisy, and well art allows it, so taught art, and then - design made more sense, at least I’d get paid too!

Defining art is like defining who am I. And what did that fellow conclude about that? “I am” because I wonder about it, but not only wonder, I put myself in knots, and I’m not even flexible enough like some Yogi Sadhu to unravel it all.

So the knot stays, and the conclusion hits a dead end - I’m in knots, so I must be the “I” in knots! But then again, how do we know? Who can say?

At that point the other leap of philosophy, if we can’t know, then knowing is simply claiming to know, and why the hell would we knot ourselves all up like that for no reason at all? (do we need a reason)

Oh but it must be “power”, coz that’s all I ever wanted from my never seeing or feeling my own powerlessness - so it’s got to be the same for everyone else, right?

Well maybe not, very unlikely not! Just like Freud’s secret fantasy about his mum…

But even that’s a claim to knowing, to possessing knowledge - a signal of power to be overcome!

Talk about knots within knots, within knots - even the most rubbery, sinewy fruitarian couldn’t untangle themselves from that!!

But well, seriously - art? It’s like a breath out. And philosophy, perhaps a breath in…

Inhale “I am” exhale (um who’s that “I” again? Oh that’s right…) “I am”

Descartes simply forgot to ask the next rational question - and calls himself a rationalist!

So there we have it, art is breath, and breath is life, and we need to breathe in from time to time (can’t exhale forever)…

Well thank God for philosophy!!

Expand full comment
Simp Of Human Progress's avatar

Art allows me to express and show how I imagine the future should be or hope it will be like.

By the way nice sketch

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts